(no title)
jartelt | 2 years ago
It would be very difficult to reach that scale with reforestation and afforestation along in the next 27 years.
Plus, if you simply bury wood it will be broken down over time and release methane. No one has yet developed a scalable way to bury large quantities of wood and keep them from decomposing (startups/researchers are starting to work in this area).
cmrdporcupine|2 years ago
If converted to charcoal ("biochar") through pyrolisis first it's much better, and won't release methane or CO2 (and enriches soil)
The bigger issue would be the logistics, and the amount of CO2 emissions simply involved in processing and burying it.
cogman10|2 years ago
That being said, the way you do this isn't specifically with reforestation, rather, this needs to be tree farming with fast growing trees. Perhaps even geneticly engineering trees for this specific purpose.
jartelt|2 years ago
Sure, you can reforest or afforest with whatever trees you want. It certainly will help but won't solve the issue alone.