[shortcake27]

So your argument is that the right to drive a road-legal vehicle dangerously on private property is more important than the right to not get killed by a drunk driver on a public road?

[Retr0id]

You already have the right to not get killed by a drunk driver on a public road.

[shortcake27]

I think you’re attempting to play with words to skirt around the question, despite the fact you know exactly what I’m saying. But let’s phrase it a different way.

Are you saying it’s more important for people to have the ability to drive road-legal cars dangerously on private property, than it is to prevent fatal accidents caused by drunk drivers?

[hiatus]

This is a false dichotomy. There are myriad ways to prevent drunk driving that are not this technology.