(no title)
imrehg | 2 years ago
Any other versions one should take themselves (say one of the MP3 variants), that have any tangible benefits?
imrehg | 2 years ago
Any other versions one should take themselves (say one of the MP3 variants), that have any tangible benefits?
kibibu|2 years ago
wilsonnb3|2 years ago
JTyQZSnP3cQGa8B|2 years ago
I know that I shouldn’t do this but I download the FLAC version and compress it to Opus 192kbps. It’s very high quality with the size of an MP3. I won’t be able to change the format and recompress it later, but I don’t really mind.
jMyles|2 years ago
imrehg|2 years ago
But yeah, as storage space & bandwidth are less and less an issue, if FLAC is fully supported across the board, the scale should be tipped. My worry comes from we not quite being there yet.
15457345234|2 years ago
[deleted]
dang|2 years ago
Personal attacks are particularly unwelcome and will get you banned here, so please don't do that.
If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.
DavidPeiffer|2 years ago
I just downloaded from Bandcamp for the first time. I've heard FLAC is sort of the go-to format for good quality, but when presented with ALAC, WAV, and AIFF which all had larger filesizes, I paused and asked a friend.
phlakaton|2 years ago
OP – the reason they state this is that FLAC is lossless so offers limited compression but preserves input audio exactly. AAC is a lossy compression format and will discard input audio data that it thinks you don't need – converting it to other formats may produce artifacts. OGG is a container that supports both lossless and lossy internal formats, but I believe it's typically used with a lossy internal format (called Vorbis).