(no title)
negidius | 2 years ago
The difference is that the current decision makers only have power because other people trust them voluntarily. That makes them accountable, and it means a whistleblower can do much more to limit the damage by leaking the fact they are giving after to US pressure.
A government can impose its will by force, so it is much less accountable and doesn't have to worry about the consequences of its decisions nearly as much. There is nothing I can realistically do if I object to a decision by a government unless I'm a large political donor because governments don't need my consent to operate.
lmm|2 years ago
Not really. Plenty of EU citizens don't trust Microsoft, Google or Apple. But there's no practical alternative. The government of an individual EU country has a lot more accountability than that.
negidius|2 years ago
Governments ultimately derive their power from their ability to impose their will by violence. That makes them inherently less accountable than organizations that you are free to ignore.