I did not ask the learned resilience claimant for evidence, because I take resilience training to be orthodox for the psychological community, and I believe the person I responded to does as well. Information is surprise, and the surprise factor is presumably in the requested evidence supporting the unorthodox position.I give my own reference below and a quotation from it.
“A meta-analysis found a moderate positive effect of resilience interventions (0.44 (95% CI 0.23 to 0.64) with subgroup analysis suggesting CBT-based, mindfulness and mixed interventions were effective.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6009510/
No comments yet.