top | item 38422017

(no title)

ulizzle | 2 years ago

In that case the Russians would have scorched Stalingrad, which they didn’t. They didn’t because of the symbolism behind it

discuss

order

jltsiren|2 years ago

Scorched earth had lost most of its military significance by WW2. The USSR tried it in 1941, but it failed, because trucks had revolutionized warfare. They could transport food over long distances, allowing armies go to places where they previously couldn't and stay there.

In 1812, Napoleon suffered huge losses in the first weeks of the invasion, before fighting a single major battle. His army could not find enough food in Russia. In 1941, the total number of Axis military deaths during Operation Barbarossa was comparable to what Napoleon suffered in those first weeks, despite many battles and much larger scale. When the invasion failed, the troops mostly just stayed there and tried again next year.

jjtheblunt|2 years ago

Stalingrad the name wouldn’t exist for another century. Was the location with former name as symbolic?

jjtheblunt|2 years ago

too late to edit the above, realizing i left the name Volgograd (city on the Volga river) out.