top | item 38432127

How are zlib, gzip and zip related?

300 points| damagednoob | 2 years ago |stackoverflow.com

77 comments

order

ctur|2 years ago

What a great historical summary. Compression has moved on now but having grown up marveling at PKZip and maximizing usable space on very early computers, as well as compression in modems (v42bis ftw!), this field has always seemed magical.

These days it generally is better to prefer Zstandard to zlib/gzip for many reasons. And if you need seekable format, consider squashfs as a reasonable choice. These stand on the shoulders of the giants of zlib and zip but do indeed stand much higher in the modern world.

michaelrpeskin|2 years ago

I had forgotten about modem compression. Back in the BBS days when you had to upload files to get new files, you usually had a ratio (20 bytes download for every byte you uploaded). I would always use the PKZIP no compression option for the archive to upload because Z-Modem would take care of compression over the wire. So I didn't burn my daily time limit by uploading a large file and I got more credit for my download ratios.

I was a silly kid.

lxgr|2 years ago

> These days it generally is better to prefer Zstandard to zlib/gzip for many reasons.

I'd agree for new applications, but just like MP3, .gz files (and by extension .tar.gz/.tgz) and zlib streams will probably be around for a long time for compatibility reasons.

pvorb|2 years ago

I think zlib/gzip still has its place these days. It's still a decent choice for most use cases. If you don't know what usage patterns your program will see, zlib still might be a good choice. Plus, it's supported virtually everywhere, which makes it interesting for long-term storage. Often, using one of the modern alternatives is not worth the hassle.

emmelaich|2 years ago

Fun fact: in a sense. gzip can have multiple files, but not in a specially useful way ...

    $ echo meow >cat                                                            
    $ echo woof > dog                                                           
    $ gzip cat                                                                  
    $ gzip dog                                                                  
    $ cat cat.gz dog.gz >animals.gz                                             
    $ gunzip animals.gz                                                         
    $ cat animals                                                               
    meow                                                                        
    woof

ericpauley|2 years ago

Imo all file formats should be concatenable when possible. Thankfully ZStandard purposefully also supports this, which is a huge boon for combining files.

Fun fact, tar-files are also (semi-) concatenable, you'll just need to `-i` when decompressing. This also means compressed (using gz/zstd) tarfiles are also (semi-)concatenable!

billyhoffman|2 years ago

WARC files (used by the Internet Archive to power the Wayback machine, among others) use this trick too to have a a compressed file format that is seek-able to individual HTTP request/response records

lxgr|2 years ago

Wow, that's surprising (at least to me)!

Is there a limit in the default gunzip implementation? I'm aware of the concept of ZIP/tar bombs, but I wouldn't have expected gunzip to ever produce more than one output file, at least when invoked without options.

cout|2 years ago

Interesting -- I did not realize that the zip format supports lzma, bzip2, and zstd. What software supports those compression methods? Can Windows Explorer read zip files produced with those compression methods?

(I have been using 7zip for about 15 years to produce archive files that have an index and can quickly extract a single file and can use multiple cores for compression, but I would love to have an alternative, if one exists).

ForkMeOnTinder|2 years ago

7zip has a dropdown called "Compression method" in the "Add to Archive" dialog that lets you choose.

pixl97|2 years ago

Until windows 11, no, windows zip only seems to deal with COMPRESS/DEFLATE zip files.

melagonster|2 years ago

For people who first read this: the sweet part is in the comments :)

dcow|2 years ago

What’s even more sad is that the SO community has since consequently destroyed SO as the home for this type of info. This post would now be considered off topic as it’s “not a good format for a Q&A site”. You’d never see it happen today. Truly sad.

stavros|2 years ago

Hah, imagine asking Mark Adler for gzip history references.

dustypotato|2 years ago

Found this hilarious:

> This post is packed with so much history and information that I feel like some citations need be added

> I am the reference

(extracted a part of the conversation)

gmgmgmgmgm|2 years ago

That's disallowed on Wikipedia. There, you must reference some "source". That "source" doesn't need to be reliable or correct, it just needs to be some random website that's not the actual person. First sources are disallowed.

whalesalad|2 years ago

Reminds me of when I was inadvertently arguing here on HN with the inventor of the actor model about what actors are

FartyMcFarter|2 years ago

"I'm the one who knocks".

HexDecOctBin|2 years ago

Is there an archive format that supports appending diff's of an existing file, so that multiple versions of the same file are stored? PKZIP has a proprietary extension (supposedly), but I couldn't find any open version of that.

(I was thinking of a creating a version control system whose .git directory equivalent is basically an archive file that can easily be emailed, etc.)

pizza|2 years ago

New versions of zstd allow you to produce patches using the trained dictionary feature

wiredfool|2 years ago

The real question is: how are zlib and libz related?

o11c|2 years ago

zlib is the name of the project. libz is an implementation-detail name of the library on Unix-like systems.

Dwedit|2 years ago

See a highly upvoted answer in a question about zlib related things, suspect it was probably posted by Mark Adler, and turn out to be correct.

raggi|2 years ago

The answer is good, but is missing a key section:

Salty form: They're all quite slow compared to modern competitors.

levzettelin|2 years ago

What are some of those modern competitors?

readyplayernull|2 years ago

gzip can be used to (de)compress directories recursively in a variable:

FOO=$(tar cf - folderToCompress | gzip | base64)

echo $FOO | base64 - d | zcat | tar xf -

encom|2 years ago

(2013)