top | item 38449905

(no title)

cgdub | 2 years ago

We’ve had Lisp for 60 years, but instead of using that, we’re going to have LLMs write the boilerplate for us.

You will still have to read the boilerplate of course.

discuss

order

mattgreenrocks|2 years ago

Another week, another article lauding how simple Golang is, and everyone nodding in agreement.

starttoaster|2 years ago

As a professional Golang dev (among other responsibilities), I see more hate for Go on the internet than praise. Like most things people complain about, I usually can barely discern what people's exact complaints are, as most people seem to just complain about the unknown. I take it you get the opposite on your travels around the internet, and I'm just wondering, how do I get into your newsfeeds? The internet algorithms seem to be putting us both in the wrong places, and I'm wondering if we might be having a Freaky Friday moment, if you will.

sterlind|2 years ago

Use LLMs to package libraries for Lisp, then! Ecosystem size won't be Lisp's barrier to adoption anymore.

kragen|2 years ago

things like type declarations make code easier to read in many cases

llms are better at reading and explaining code than at writing it in my experience