[slindsey]

Based on my experience with Large Language Models (LLM) so far, I see more value in niche sites that marginalia will help the user find.

An LLM is regurgitating what it reads, true or false. There's a bias for things it sees more often. There's randomness in the response. Sure, humans are error-prone but a problem with known computer responses is that humans tend to think "a computer did this so it must be right." And LLMs are not pumping out true thoughtful answers but simply putting a string of probably words together.

The internet is vast and is increasingly filled with garbage, stolen and duplicated data, and monetization. It's nice to be able to look in the nooks and crannies of the internet for data.

I'm actually more interested in sites that do personal curation of interesting links that are personally vetted and of interest to someone than what's found through google or chatgpt.