This data is really not that useful, or doesn't reflect what the simple title suggests it does.
There doesn't appear to be any attempt to control for job level, and it's not even clear how one would control for such a thing. Public company stock and private company stock appear to be valued the same which may be true on the surface, but is a wild misrepresentation of reality (in many ways). Different companies need different distributions of skills, so would have different median salaries even though they might be paying the same amount for the same job. This doesn't account for geographical distribution, those centered in the bay area are likely going to be higher up this list despite others potentially paying much better in their regions.
The data seems wildly inaccurate. The total comp for some of the private companies seems way too high, not to mention how the equity is extremely illiquid. The total comp for nvidia seems way low given how their recent performance.
And there are a ton of large "boring" tech companies that are not on the list at all. I don't expect that they're anywhere close to leading the pack in comp, but not in the top 500?
well, some private companies have liquidation events regularly, like Stripe or SpaceX. I'd consider that only slightly more risky than a public company.
I assume the same for Databricks, but i'm not sure?
I think nvidia has some title inflation. I have a friend who work there as 'distinguished engineer', and it's more likely they would be L6 or L7 at FAANG.
I'm guessing overall Nvidia's comp is very similar to most FAANGs in terms of skill and YOE but not title (maybe excepting entry level, since it goes lower and is more fine grained).
“ In March 2022, OpenSea saw revenues of $61.33 million; in March 2023, it had revenues of $172.33k. The drop represented a whopping 99.72% fall. The platform's fees have also fallen from $193.94 million in March 2022 to $1.41 million in March 2023.”
That’s OpenSea, no 11 on the list making $1.4m of monthly revenue and paying SWEs 430k salary
How would you know they're inaccurate, unless you work in HR and know everyone's salaries? Just because the median is lower or higher than you or your immediate peers doesn't mean it's inaccurate, because you might have a bias
Agreed. I've worked at more than one company on this list, in positions with visibility into multiple peoples' total comp, and none of those are shown accurately here.
Saw the description on the README which shows median, fair, but there's a lot of nuance such as whether or not it's a new offer, location, and level. As a consumer of this info I'd usually try to understand comp against those extra dimensions. That said, great simple table though!
1. Posting some methodology in the README might be good, such as any filtering you did or didn't do.
2. You do have some obvious duplicates on there, e.g. `cit` and `citadel`, `jane` and `jane-street`. It's probably not worth the effort to manually clean that up, but I figured I'd mention.
Is this new offers only? Because it matters a lot. I know people who joined Facebook an year ago when the stock was at rock bottom and are now making 800k+ as a Senior, mostly due to stock appreciation. (And thus reporting as such on levels.fyi)
This list in inaccurate. Renaissance Technologies isn't even listed, and they offer very high TC. TGS Management offers way more than $500k for SWEs, I know one SWE makes $700k there.
If the numbers are wildly inaccurate as everyone seems to be saying, what are the actual highest-paying tech companies? The usual FAANG and quant-type companies everyone knows?
Recent OpenAI datapoints on Levels.fyi show something like $300K salary and $600K "stock", for hires just in the last few months...
Is that RSUs at some current valuation? ISOs with strike price at current(!) but assuming stratospheric growth continues over vesting period? Something else?
Is the stock value what the landslide support for the CEO-in-exile was about?
Can't speak to the accuracy of the salaries, but it's a handy list of "higher paying" tech companies for those applying right now. Nice to have it all in one place.
On the topic of levels.fyi, the enshitification of the product has begun. It won't let you access things unless you provide your work email? Yeah right, like I am going to do that. A bunch of other mandatory questions in the sign up process also irk me a lot.
This is a issue, as if you need a work email and your workplace actively monitors email and sees a confirmation message of some sort from levels, they could assume you are hunting for a new job and act on it. This seems to defeat the purpose of levels
danpalmer|2 years ago
There doesn't appear to be any attempt to control for job level, and it's not even clear how one would control for such a thing. Public company stock and private company stock appear to be valued the same which may be true on the surface, but is a wild misrepresentation of reality (in many ways). Different companies need different distributions of skills, so would have different median salaries even though they might be paying the same amount for the same job. This doesn't account for geographical distribution, those centered in the bay area are likely going to be higher up this list despite others potentially paying much better in their regions.
miketromba|2 years ago
altdataseller|2 years ago
najork|2 years ago
ghaff|2 years ago
VirusNewbie|2 years ago
I assume the same for Databricks, but i'm not sure?
I think nvidia has some title inflation. I have a friend who work there as 'distinguished engineer', and it's more likely they would be L6 or L7 at FAANG.
I'm guessing overall Nvidia's comp is very similar to most FAANGs in terms of skill and YOE but not title (maybe excepting entry level, since it goes lower and is more fine grained).
altdataseller|2 years ago
drexlspivey|2 years ago
That’s OpenSea, no 11 on the list making $1.4m of monthly revenue and paying SWEs 430k salary
codegeek|2 years ago
DeIlliad|2 years ago
ldjkfkdsjnv|2 years ago
acchow|2 years ago
notatoad|2 years ago
fnbr|2 years ago
altdataseller|2 years ago
zippergz|2 years ago
jimbokun|2 years ago
urda|2 years ago
roflyear|2 years ago
jeffchao|2 years ago
Icathian|2 years ago
1. Posting some methodology in the README might be good, such as any filtering you did or didn't do.
2. You do have some obvious duplicates on there, e.g. `cit` and `citadel`, `jane` and `jane-street`. It's probably not worth the effort to manually clean that up, but I figured I'd mention.
miketromba|2 years ago
mupuff1234|2 years ago
hiddencost|2 years ago
altdataseller|2 years ago
darth_avocado|2 years ago
Matthias247|2 years ago
VirusNewbie|2 years ago
I've seen their recruiting emails, they are happy to hint at being able to 3x whatever someone's current comp is.
runamuck|2 years ago
francisofascii|2 years ago
b8|2 years ago
blackmesaind|2 years ago
claudiulodro|2 years ago
altdataseller|2 years ago
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]
jimbob45|2 years ago
altdataseller|2 years ago
frankfrank13|2 years ago
w0m|2 years ago
neilv|2 years ago
Is that RSUs at some current valuation? ISOs with strike price at current(!) but assuming stratospheric growth continues over vesting period? Something else?
Is the stock value what the landslide support for the CEO-in-exile was about?
altdataseller|2 years ago
atlgator|2 years ago
spike021|2 years ago
cobbzilla|2 years ago
Maybe filter out the bankrupt ones?
sbarre|2 years ago
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]
Brystephor|2 years ago
There's definitely some publicly traded tech companies that are missing from the list.
peacebreaker2k|2 years ago
darth_avocado|2 years ago
LWIRVoltage|2 years ago
zuhayeer|2 years ago
networkchad|2 years ago
[deleted]
ldjkfkdsjnv|2 years ago