(no title)
wbillingsley | 2 years ago
From a quick read, they are essentially asking people to predict whether they'll be better/worse off next year, and then correlating that with whether they were right in the next year's financial data.
Their study period looks like it's the period immediately post-GFC (2009 to 2021). As I understand it, the economy has performed better for those in professional roles, who are likely to score well on the tests of cognitive ability, than it has for lower-skilled jobs. And of course in the middle of that period, there's the Brexit vote that was pretty uneven in terms of who thought the economy (and their circumstances) would go well or badly.
It's an interesting data set, but I don't think I'd be game to make the same "causative" conclusions that they do ("Our findings suggest that these supposed consequences of optimism bias, may be a side product of the true driver, low cognitive ability").
varjag|2 years ago
rTX5CMRXIfFG|2 years ago
mewpmewp2|2 years ago
So for example, let's say tech starts to boom, and everyone good with tech will all of sudden have much better financial performance, although everyone were making their predictions based on historical performance.
bspammer|2 years ago
fabatka|2 years ago
taneq|2 years ago