top | item 38548404

OpenAI setup a multi-million deal to buy chips from Altman-backed company

42 points| wmat | 2 years ago |dailyai.com

18 comments

order

gwern|2 years ago

This is a poor plagiarism of a much more detailed Wired article https://www.wired.com/story/openai-buy-ai-chips-startup-sam-... which is also much clearer than OP about what parts would raise concerns: Rain touting the Altman connection heavily despite its minimal results and apparent inability to convince anyone else to so much as write a letter of intent, and the highly unusual divestment orders suggesting some very unsavory connections, which get added to the big pile of other concerns about Altman. (See what _Time_ has reported today: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38550240 )

YPPH|2 years ago

Do you have any evidence the article was plagiarised from the source, other than the fact they write about the same thing at about the same time? It's a pretty serious allegation.

bithavoc|2 years ago

The headline makes it sound like is not entirely ethical, and then I remember reading “Before OpenAI, Altman was asked to leave by his mentor [Paul Graham] at the prominent start-up incubator Y Combinator, part of a pattern of clashes that some attribute to his self-serving approach”[0]

[0] https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/11/22/sam-alt...

germandiago|2 years ago

That said, who knows at this moment more about the topic than Altman?

I say because the headline can induce to a wrong feeling, but, if was not a company related or close to the latest developments of AI, who are more ready than them?

gamblor956|2 years ago

It seems the big takeaway tech executives took from WeWork wasn't that it was wrong but that that self-dealing is okay as long as you have enough leverage to get away with it.

It's pretty clear now this is the reason that Altman got fired in the first place.

HarHarVeryFunny|2 years ago

Maybe one of the reasons, but not clear to me it's the main or only one. Another potential reason is that he was attempting to individually manipulate board members into trying to support him in getting board member Helen Toner fired. There's also the rumor of the Q* advance which the board apparently heard of via some concerned employee(s), not from Altman.

Maybe there was some final straw that got the board to act, but could have been accumulated grievances about Altman not being candid with them.

ithkuil|2 years ago

Why didn't the board say that explicitly?

bdcravens|2 years ago

> Altman personally invested $1 million in the company

The company has taken $32.1M total

lamroger|2 years ago

Which round matters too

pashadee|2 years ago

The setup is a deal or they set something up? Please revise to "set up" if the char limit is OK

gjvc|2 years ago

Wouldn't change the meaning at all

theGnuMe|2 years ago

Hope the chips are good. They need as many gpus and specialized AI chips as they can get.

kdwikzncba|2 years ago

I mean, this guy who has a track record of conflicts of interest, was just shown that it's ok to exploit his conflicts of interest as long as others also get rich.