(no title)
pixelbyindex | 2 years ago
I have to disagree. The idea that allowing human interaction to proceed as it would without policing presents a threat to their business or our culture is not something I have seen strong enough argument for.
Allowing flagging / reporting by the users themselves is a better path to content control.
IMO the more we train ourselves that context doesn't matter, the more we will pretend that human beings are just incapable of humor, everything is offensive, and trying to understand others before judging their words is just impossible, so let the AI handle it.
comboy|2 years ago
But then you have problems like doxing. Or even without doxing promoting acts that affect certain groups or certain places. Which certain amount of people will follow, just because of the scale. You can say these people would be responsible, but with scale you can hurt without breaking the law. So where would you draw the line? Would you moderate anything?
ethbr1|2 years ago
And then the political firestorm that ensued, from people with the power to regulate Meta, quickly changed his talking points.
bentcorner|2 years ago
I don't envy anyone who has to figure all this out. IMO free hosting does not scale.
hansvm|2 years ago
ChadNauseam|2 years ago
ragequittah|2 years ago
[1]https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/09/myanmar-faceb...
[2]https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/myanmar-...
[3]https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/gambia-...