[alacode]

NAT is great. I can think of no problems caused by NAT. I can immediately think of my experiences with IPv6 and all loss of privacy.

[orangeboats]

Can't tell whether this is trolling or serious. Breaking the end-to-end principle has had profound effects on the Internet as a whole for the last 2 decades, centralization being the most obvious one.

[teddyh]

I used to keep a copy of this paper with me: <https://web.mit.edu/Saltzer/www/publications/endtoend/endtoe...>

[alacode]

Trolling? No. NAT breaks something? No. IPv6 breaks privacy at a minimum and probably opens our devices to security issues. IPv6 is what's broken.

[stavros]

I can't tell if this is sarcasm or another "I like NAT because I can't be bothered to deploy a firewall rule" comment.

[alacode]

I said nothing about a firewall. I use firewalls everywhere. I use NAT. What I don't use is IPv6.