top | item 38610393

(no title)

hp6 | 2 years ago

I think the article doesn’t provide enough arguments why this is even an issue.

For example what is the probability of such character being rendered incorectly in some standart tex? lets say a wikipedia article.

Even more so the argumet that people don’t report this because they are "not speakers of English!” is just an assumption. Not to mention that translation applications are more than good enough for such a task.

discuss

order

bashauma|2 years ago

>Even more so the argumet that people don’t report this because they are "not speakers of English!” is just an assumption. Not to mention that translation applications are more than good enough for such a task.

Frankly, people have learned helplessness[0] about these oddities and don't think to report them when they see them, so the inference that something isn't serious just because it's not pointed out is weak.

In the first place, the proportion of software users who raise issues on GitHub/other is small, and when devs are a group of people who communicate in characters that are not used in their daily life, the translation apps they have at hand is not very encouraging.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learned_helplessness

(Disclosure: I'm CJK native)

vore|2 years ago

The issue is that the language is not accurately represented – imagine in English instead of the Latin letter "a" you see the Greek letter "α". It's still legible but it's not unreasonable to ask for an accurate depiction of a language.

hp6|2 years ago

The letter “a” has a frequency of ~8%, and it would indead be anoying, but lets say the letter “q” is rendered incorrectly which has a frequency of ~0.1% then thats just some minor issue.