(no title)
impegh | 2 years ago
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...
Is this just some performative grousing or do you really think what has been developed to date is “artificial intelligence”?
These comments all conveniently fail to define their author’s goalposts that apparently have been reached or surpassed. What were yours?
cornel_io|2 years ago
Notice how nobody is talking about the Turing Test anymore now that it's either already been passed or is very damn close? We can argue back and forth about whether the real stupidity was the earlier expectation that the Turing Test was a useful threshold for AI, but it's impossible to claim that it wasn't a somewhat common and well-known one, so that goalpost really has been moved in a very dramatic way (or rather, removed altogether and replaced with nothing in particular other than a vague "I'll know it when I see it", in most cases).
creer|2 years ago
But it is also true that numerous ground techniques are issue of the field of AI and generally called AI as they come out. It makes for good press. And that too was silly.
resonious|2 years ago
quickthrower2|2 years ago
F-Lexx|2 years ago