top | item 38667642

Google Will Stop Telling Law Enforcement Which Users Were Near a Crime

67 points| grammers | 2 years ago |finance.yahoo.com

28 comments

order

advisedwang|2 years ago

The actual blog post that this article rehashes: https://blog.google/products/maps/updates-to-location-histor...

risfriend|2 years ago

Google itself today tries to get you to back up everything online to be used across its ecosystem. If I choose to pause my "Web and app activity" - https://myactivity.google.com/activitycontrols?pli=1 after which my activity stops getting backed up online, Google also stops storing any sort of history on local device - across all google apps - either allow everything or zero history. No local caching, not even my last search shows up in maps.

Will be interested to see if this behavior changes.

nulld3v|2 years ago

Unfortunately, I'm fairly sure this wouldn't really help given that service providers still maintain records of which phones connected to which towers.

It's still a nice change though, and I like that they allow users to still send encrypted backups of their location history to the cloud.

thfuran|2 years ago

Service providers don't just maintain history, they package up real time location info for sale through third parties.

ThrowawayTestr|2 years ago

Yup. Leave your phone at home if you're gonna commit a crime.

est31|2 years ago

Tbh with 5G around, there is no need for Google's data. Carriers can localize phones well enough already now.

rightbyte|2 years ago

I honestly want my old landline phone back.

badrabbit|2 years ago

Gen-z/alpha will lament at millenials screwing them over with crap like this. Same as how millenials lament about boomers and the state of the economy.

The solution is legal not tech. 5G and wifi6 may allow the government to listen in and watch everything we do but it is the law that can prevent them from doing that. Even in public, there is an expectation of privacy. If you look up a woman's skirt, you can't use "she was in public" as an excuse, it's still a crime because there was an expectation of privacy.

Anyone should be allowed to view and record public activities but not in a way that unveils information explicitly hidden from the public. If you have x-ray vision like superman for example, it would be illegal to see under people's cloths or to read information in the journal in their pocket. Now replace x-ray vision with 5G/wifi6 radio.

jakobov|2 years ago

Maybe a bit contrarian but unless law enforcement is abusing this I think it's good for Google to share this info. I want to live in a society where criminals are caught.

netsharc|2 years ago

This is an extreme example, but:

Like the crime of wanting to save your own life? [1]

Edit: forgot to add how abortion is related to location data: after the "Christian" Talibans made abortion illegal, location data became subpeonable to see if someone visited an abortion clinic, if you tracked your periods on an app, this data too, because if you stopped having periods and a few months later it resumed, is that enough proof for a criminal conviction?

Funny to think how the tech companies are slowly realizing, maybe even their 50 domestic markets have regimes that are not liberal democracies, and can abuse laws...

For a more elaborate answer, watch this video: [2], TL;DW your democracy might not last and despots could take over and actually abuse the data they have on you. MAGA 2024, anyone? I mean the whole red states/Taliban-esque "we own women's body" laws is already plenty of steps in that direction...

[1] https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/texas-woman-sought-c...

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9_PjdU3Mpo

badrabbit|2 years ago

You would like China then.

In the US and most of the west, governments derive their power from the governed, which means their ability to investigate crime is at the consent of the governed as well. It is due to the law not catching up to technology that google has been allowed to share that information.

If cops need information to catch criminals they should get warrants. No company can refuse such a request so long as a magistrate reviews it as being a lawful pursuit of justice.

eviks|2 years ago

That's not contrarian, this is an extremely common ignorant view similar to "nothing to hide" (of course they are abusing it and not catching themselves)

throwaway14356|2 years ago

With everyone carrying a phone things are getting increasingly silly.

The convincing part to me is the bad guys increasingly sophisticated use of technology. They know exactly where the victims are 24/7 (if they want to)