(no title)
SenAnder | 2 years ago
But state and federal funding supplements local tax school funding to achieve approximately equal funding per pupil, and the US is 4th in the world (behind only Luxembourg, Norway, and Iceland) in per-student primary education spending [1]. So what makes those schools "good"?
[1] https://www.statista.com/statistics/238733/expenditure-on-ed...
sokoloff|2 years ago
We’re in Cambridge, MA (one high school for the entire city). I bet the correlations among parents’ academic achievement, household income, parental involvement, and kids’ scholastic accomplishment are all positive or strongly positive. (There cannot be a difference in school, being only one.)
renewiltord|2 years ago
Why should an arbitrary child whose parents are paying 100,000 INR in India end up with better start to finish improvement over an arbitrary child in the US whose government is spending $17,000? Here are the numbers adjusted to match:
100,000 INR converts to $1,202
India's PPP coefficient is 3.5x
Therefore, 100,000 INR is equivalent to $4,200 in the US.
A quarter of the spending and the start-to-finish delta is much higher there. The reason we can't do that here is multifaceted, but maybe the answer is looking to how their schools do it.
s1artibartfast|2 years ago
ipaddr|2 years ago
notjoemama|2 years ago
Bingo. It's parenting. I won't go into how I can positively confirm this, but I can as a "captain" as reddit used to refer to it...
Wealthy areas still out fund raise, out tax, and out volunteer poorer areas.