I watched this a few nights ago and it's still on my mind. Flying over
mountainous dense forest with no hope of a safe landing while swerving
to stop the birds from flying into the propeller was exciting. But
what got me was them waking up at dawn and going to bed in the same
room at night, every day for weeks, wearing a yellow jump suit (so
that the chicks would bond/imprint with them as surrogate
mothers). Attenborough even says, "the pay is awful" - they are
basically volunteers.
This makes me think of the "Moral Equivalent of War" - I mean, in some
ways we really are in a war for sanity - nothing else explains such
level of motivation. Those women are literally living their lives to
the full fighting for something they passionately believe in.
For bird people joining or helping out at a bird rescue is a great thing that feels meaningful and (if there is one nearby) very accessible at the same time.
There was a similar project with Sandhill cranes in the US, starting in the 90s. It looks like there are questions about making the parenting too easy and not preparing the young for life on their own, so that specific program ended.
It seems like a useful tool for keeping a population alive and getting them to good places, but there are limits to using it long term. Still, as a way to get captive raised birds into the wild it seems like about the only good option.
No, it's not PPG. It's PPM/PPC. (Powered Paramotor).
In the olden days of the 80's, ultralights were the rage but were difficult to store and transport the wing. PPM/PPC has the problem of transporting a cart. If you're able-bodied and can run and fall correctly then PPG, otherwise PPC.
I’m honestly not sure if it’s okay nowadays to say this out loud (even when it’s positive), but the pilots are both girls. Fantastic role models, protecting the nature AND by doing something usually considered a male activity. (the gender ratio in aviation is abysmal)
It could be more positive to refer to them as women, or female, since you compare with male in the context of the gender ratio. Girls are children, but the pilots in the article are adult scientists.
I'm sorry to have to point this out - the story is lovely, and your comment is intended positively - but the pilots were men. The scientists who worked with the birds, and led the expedition, are women, but they were passengers, not aviators.
[+] [-] nonrandomstring|2 years ago|reply
This makes me think of the "Moral Equivalent of War" - I mean, in some ways we really are in a war for sanity - nothing else explains such level of motivation. Those women are literally living their lives to the full fighting for something they passionately believe in.
[+] [-] Hnrobert42|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tapland|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dendrite9|2 years ago|reply
It seems like a useful tool for keeping a population alive and getting them to good places, but there are limits to using it long term. Still, as a way to get captive raised birds into the wild it seems like about the only good option.
https://www.spokesman.com/stories/1997/oct/10/pilot-to-crane... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Migration
[+] [-] throwup238|2 years ago|reply
Edit: looks like its called a “powered parachute”: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powered_parachute
[+] [-] askonomm|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] 1letterunixname|2 years ago|reply
In the olden days of the 80's, ultralights were the rage but were difficult to store and transport the wing. PPM/PPC has the problem of transporting a cart. If you're able-bodied and can run and fall correctly then PPG, otherwise PPC.
Disclaimer: Purveyor of PPG.
[+] [-] stevenwoo|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Brajeshwar|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] LukaszWiktor|2 years ago|reply
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10204940/
[+] [-] ChrisMarshallNY|2 years ago|reply
It may have been the same folks. They’ve been doing this for a while.
[+] [-] Toutouxc|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] clort|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] eszed|2 years ago|reply