[son_of_gloin]

Corporations aren't democratic organizations though so every individual in the group doesn't really have an equal access to these rights.

[WendyTheWillow]

What’s not clear to me is why a corporation’s specific governance would matter. When a company “speaks”, it’s still an individual ultimately expressing themselves, just with the benefit of compensation.

[BobaFloutist]

And a nearly impregnable shield from criminal liability.

[g-b-r]

Sure, expressing themselves...

[megaman821]

Presumably the board could stop corporate speech the majority does not agree with. It would be interesting to re-litigate this case with a company like Facebook where Zuckerberg has special voting shares. If donating to a PAC is just a group of people exercising their free speech, can you delegate your right to free speech to someone else?

[g-b-r]

The most f* up aspect is interpreting corruption as "free speech", for both individuals and corporations.

[polski-g]

Publicly traded corporations are democratic organizations. You get one vote per share you hold. If you want something to happen, the shareholders can vote for it.