Personal anecdote, since day one me and my wife have been speaking to our baby girl like she is our best friend. For example in the mornings I’d never let my daughter just mong out in front of the TV while making breakfast. I bought a montessori step so she can climb up and stand next to me as I wash vegetables, cut bread, fry eggs, brew coffee, etc. and I talk to her non stop. I name everything I touch, I involve her by making her hold items, press buttons etc and her speech development is phenomenal for her age. She is 17 months now and speaks German to me, English to my wife and Gujarati to her grandmother. She can’t speak normally yet but she picked up in all three languages enough vocabulary already to say exactly what she wants or if something is not right. She counts beyond 10 in two languages and knows to say words in German to me and in English to my wife. We can point at an item in succession and she’d say it in the correct language depending on who pointed to it. It’s amazing, I see other kids at her age and they literally can barely say 5 words.
This finding is even less surprising, since it could come about by either nature or nurture — whereas height is mostly determined by nature, in the absence of malnutrition.
Incredible scientific breakthrough here. Kids may speak sooner and have a better vocabulary if their parents talk more. Almost as if they learn from us. Amazing!
I think comments here don't focus on the most important point of this study, and article:
- citation: But the findings don’t necessarily mean kids speak more because they hear more speech, he says: Instead, “Adults [might] talk back more to kids who produce more language.”
- article show no evidence of socio-economic difference contrary to what was claimed before
- article have a huge database over the world, which makes it a strong study.
- article is a baby step: the next step are to know if it's talking to the child or if it's talking beside the child, for example.
Idk I have a mother who legit never stops talking and I'm the complete opposite. My brother and I play a game when we're all together where we see if we can count to 30 without her talking. Never once hit 30, closest was like 22.
The study was with kids, so maybe that changes as they get older?
I have a relative like that. Now that my wife barely cares about what I have to say, I’ve realised how My mom is different. When I was a child, She would share anecdotes from her daily life, involving coworkers and stuff. And she would ask me and remember my questions.
I bet that had a sought impact on my language development.
It's an interesting question. Maybe a parent that monopolize the conversation impact negatively.
As for your experience, keep in mind that with statistics comes distribution of outcomes, you could be on that small % where things didn't work as observed in the article.
Me smol brain grog. I grunt at my boy once a week. His mother/my wife has given up of having a conversation with me.
My boy's a philosophy major who is constantly on the phone walking someone through some game for the fun of it, or debating philosophy. I do not understand half of what he says.
Subhead here is the important and interesting finding, not the headline: "Global data set suggests socioeconomic status does not play a role in children’s language development"
Kids can “read” books from around 6 months of age, IMHE YMMV
They memorise them and recite them along with mom. I gather, when he gets to decipher the Latin script, it’ll be easier for him to understand the words he’s expecting to read
Some times it blows my mind to discover that some bleeding obvious things arent well established. Next thing you're gonna discover that kids with funnier parents tell more jokes, or that kids with angrier parents shout more.
Of course the interesting science would be - nature or nurture?
Eg in a “village” would the kids of quiet parents be exposed all day to all these other talkative people, and therefore the effect disappears? Or is it genetic?
It may be obvious, but as a relative HN long timer, I've been hit too many times with the "source please" when making statements based on what I thought were obvious well known things, so studies like these are ammo for those sticklers who insist on seeing the sauce for everything.
Are you sure it's obvious? I have parents that are always joking and what they transmitted me is to hate everything, in my experience people tend to hate the traits they grow up with and to which they're continuously exposed, as I hear often "Who did he take it from?"
The whole point of study is to break down these “obvious” conclusions and make sure we understand the exact causal chain, free of confounding variables. Extremely often something is studied that seems “obvious” and turns out to be anything but.
[+] [-] dustedcodes|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dkqmduems|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] onyxringer|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jareklupinski|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] baz00|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sumedh|2 years ago|reply
Probably because of genes and access to nutritious food.
[+] [-] Dolototo|2 years ago|reply
You can already see this in a lot of kids and recognize their parents through it.
[+] [-] drewcoo|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gnicholas|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] supersparrow|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wkjagt|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wkipling|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] 6nf|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] logtempo|2 years ago|reply
- citation: But the findings don’t necessarily mean kids speak more because they hear more speech, he says: Instead, “Adults [might] talk back more to kids who produce more language.”
- article show no evidence of socio-economic difference contrary to what was claimed before
- article have a huge database over the world, which makes it a strong study.
- article is a baby step: the next step are to know if it's talking to the child or if it's talking beside the child, for example.
[+] [-] leosanchez|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] throwaway743|2 years ago|reply
The study was with kids, so maybe that changes as they get older?
[+] [-] Erratic6576|2 years ago|reply
I bet that had a sought impact on my language development.
[+] [-] logtempo|2 years ago|reply
As for your experience, keep in mind that with statistics comes distribution of outcomes, you could be on that small % where things didn't work as observed in the article.
[+] [-] hydrok9|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gnicholas|2 years ago|reply
This finding would be predicted by both nature and nurture. How is it a "much needed contribution"?
[+] [-] RecycledEle|2 years ago|reply
Me smol brain grog. I grunt at my boy once a week. His mother/my wife has given up of having a conversation with me.
My boy's a philosophy major who is constantly on the phone walking someone through some game for the fun of it, or debating philosophy. I do not understand half of what he says.
[+] [-] dragonwriter|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] o11c|2 years ago|reply
So prior to (most) reading, which dominates vocabulary afterwards.
[+] [-] Erratic6576|2 years ago|reply
They memorise them and recite them along with mom. I gather, when he gets to decipher the Latin script, it’ll be easier for him to understand the words he’s expecting to read
[+] [-] xnx|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|2 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] kdwikzncba|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dang|2 years ago|reply
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
[+] [-] andyferris|2 years ago|reply
Eg in a “village” would the kids of quiet parents be exposed all day to all these other talkative people, and therefore the effect disappears? Or is it genetic?
[+] [-] FirmwareBurner|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lnxg33k1|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] redcobra762|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Garvi|2 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] tetris11|2 years ago|reply