top | item 38735935 (no title) norenh | 2 years ago > NAT was a necessity when it was being introduced, so I don't understand the complaints. Sure it's annoying, but what was the alternative?IPv6 discuss order hn newest crazygringo|2 years ago Nope. IPv6 still isn't supported everywhere.When you're running out of addresses, you need a workable solution at the moment.Not something that requires all networking equipment worldwide to be replaced with a new standard all at once, with is a practical impossibility. BenjiWiebe|2 years ago It doesn't have to be replaced all at once. Most of it already has been replaced. load replies (1) fiddlerwoaroof|2 years ago IPv6 would have been great if it was just bigger addresses but the actual system we got suffers heavily from the second-system effect.
crazygringo|2 years ago Nope. IPv6 still isn't supported everywhere.When you're running out of addresses, you need a workable solution at the moment.Not something that requires all networking equipment worldwide to be replaced with a new standard all at once, with is a practical impossibility. BenjiWiebe|2 years ago It doesn't have to be replaced all at once. Most of it already has been replaced. load replies (1)
BenjiWiebe|2 years ago It doesn't have to be replaced all at once. Most of it already has been replaced. load replies (1)
fiddlerwoaroof|2 years ago IPv6 would have been great if it was just bigger addresses but the actual system we got suffers heavily from the second-system effect.
crazygringo|2 years ago
When you're running out of addresses, you need a workable solution at the moment.
Not something that requires all networking equipment worldwide to be replaced with a new standard all at once, with is a practical impossibility.
BenjiWiebe|2 years ago
fiddlerwoaroof|2 years ago