[kiwih]

I'm a print subscriber to Wired and read it cover to cover most months. I find most issues pretty good and usually learn all kinds of interesting details about things happening in the tech world. They even have a hacker column, in a recent issue the writer talked about his journey setting up and using a raspberry pi based radio telescope. What would you say Wired is missing now compared to its first iterations?

[TMWNN]

>What would you say Wired is missing now compared to its first iterations?

Wired's so-called "review" of Hogwarts Legacy is an abomination. <https://www.wired.com/review/hogwarts-legacy-review/>

PS - Check out the author's other works for the magazine.

[rdl]

I mostly stopped reading it in ~2021/2022, but from ~2015-2021 it was getting progressively more hostile to tech, fearful of anything new, etc.

I skimmed the online list of articles for the past few months and it does look better (but not 1993-1997 high water mark, or 1997-2021 still ok). There have been two different editors in chief since 2021, maybe that was a factor.

[kiwih]

That's interesting and I appreciate your response. I didn't subscribe until 2020 so perhaps I missed the downward swing and have only seen it on the up?

[10111001]

> I mostly stopped reading it in ~2021/2022, but from ~2015-2021 it was getting progressively more hostile to tech, fearful of anything new, etc.

It's would be hard for them to maintain the kind of techo-optimism they had in their early years, without sounding delusional, given what we've learned since.

[graphe]

When I think of wired I think of articles written by andrew hultkrans. I have a video of him I tried to get a discussion on, but even in 1993 he was already mentioning smart cards and tvs.