top | item 38766604 (no title) paolomaffei | 2 years ago I laughed when I read the substraction of 0 legs for each legless elephant. Then I did a double take... 8 legs per elephant is standard? discuss order hn newest ajb|2 years ago I know right?What's funny is that I would also have subtracted 0, because legless is local slang for 'drunk', so the legless elephants aren't, under that interpretation, missing any legs. labster|2 years ago And if they’re seeing double, Bard is right all along! labster|2 years ago ISO compliant pachyderms are so difficult to find these days yourad_io|2 years ago I blame big Zoo layer8|2 years ago Maybe a confusion with https://www.cnet.com/science/maratus-elephans-the-peacock-sp.... ;)
ajb|2 years ago I know right?What's funny is that I would also have subtracted 0, because legless is local slang for 'drunk', so the legless elephants aren't, under that interpretation, missing any legs. labster|2 years ago And if they’re seeing double, Bard is right all along!
labster|2 years ago ISO compliant pachyderms are so difficult to find these days yourad_io|2 years ago I blame big Zoo
layer8|2 years ago Maybe a confusion with https://www.cnet.com/science/maratus-elephans-the-peacock-sp.... ;)
ajb|2 years ago
What's funny is that I would also have subtracted 0, because legless is local slang for 'drunk', so the legless elephants aren't, under that interpretation, missing any legs.
labster|2 years ago
labster|2 years ago
yourad_io|2 years ago
layer8|2 years ago