(no title)
simbolit | 2 years ago
There are oodles of use-cases where sending your data to an outside provider is a complete no-go. In these cases OpenAI/Google/whoever-products aren't relevant competition.
simbolit | 2 years ago
There are oodles of use-cases where sending your data to an outside provider is a complete no-go. In these cases OpenAI/Google/whoever-products aren't relevant competition.
phillipcarter|2 years ago
And yes, there are indeed use cases where sending data to an outside provider is a no-go. The bet OpenAI is making is that they can solve for that later while building their business on use cases where it's fine to send data to an outside parameter. It may also simply not be something they care about. In my own work I know of a massive financial enterprise that has prioritized ~30 or so features where it's fine to send that data. OpenAI is not struggling to get their money.
It remains to be seen if OpenAI will also capture this market, or if fine-tuning open models to be "good enough" wins out over time. The point isn't that, though. The point is that their models are so broadly applicable that _anyone_ can get some value quickly without much work.
YetAnotherNick|2 years ago
simbolit|2 years ago
Have you ever worked in any sector that has security policies?
Even if you haven't, perhaps spend 2 minutes using a search engine?
Here is a first page result for you: https://www.tomshardware.com/news/samsung-fab-workers-leak-c...