(no title)
VFIT7CTO77TOC | 2 years ago
If you gave a population a $10k raise (in a hypothetical world with no inflation) the birth rate would probably DECREASE
VFIT7CTO77TOC | 2 years ago
If you gave a population a $10k raise (in a hypothetical world with no inflation) the birth rate would probably DECREASE
standardUser|2 years ago
There's a massive gulch between "too poor to have ubiquitous access to birth control and healthcare" and "rich enough to provide the upbringing I desire for my child". Most Americans exist in that gulch.
> But something happened to the American family over the last three decades: that downward slope became a U-turn. Women in families in the top half of the income spectrum are having more kids than their similar-earning counterparts did 20 years ago. Women from the very richest households are now having more children than those less-well off.
https://qz.com/1125805/the-reason-the-richest-women-in-the-u...
Give people enough resources and they'll have more kids. But it takes a lot of resources, and an increasing amount year by year, to hit that mark.
ejb999|2 years ago
Not sure I buy that - I know plenty of couples, each of them with good 6 figure salaries, who have no interest in having kids, ever - if they had 7 figure salaries, I don't think it would change their mind one bit.
jdewerd|2 years ago
It couldn't possibly be that the causal arrow points in the other direction, that kids are an economic burden, cause hardship in an already economically strained population, and those who escape do so in part because they choose not to have kids. Nah, couldn't be.
VFIT7CTO77TOC|2 years ago
jeffbee|2 years ago
https://www.niussp.org/fertility-and-reproduction/income-and...
slothtrop|2 years ago