(no title)
sqrt_1 | 2 years ago
They just added: "No person shall knowingly while in a public space engage in indecent behavior, display, distribute, or broadcast indecent material, conduct indecent events, or facilitate any of the foregoing prohibited acts."
Problem was that the referenced indecent statue definition included homosexuality, which was then removed from the definition even before it blew up on social media
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/11/22/ten...
https://www.politifact.com/article/2023/nov/28/did-a-city-in...
sapphicsnail|2 years ago
ethanbond|2 years ago
I guess they get kudos for removing “homosexuality” from the definition of “indecent acts” in 2023!
In any case, the question is whether there’s reason to believe this will be a slippery slope. There’s obviously a pattern of increasing moral regulation throughout the country including book bans. That this particular instance of moral regulation was a bit complicated in its implementation and (allegedly) accidentally overzealous in its scope doesn’t negate the trend.