top | item 38839230

(no title)

rocketbop | 2 years ago

It was for the mammoths.

discuss

order

bawolff|2 years ago

And for the people who liked to eat mammoths

More to the point, the word "tragedy" in context isn't saying that the end result is neccesarily a tragedy for the people involved. The "tragedy" is our (alleged) inability to have nice shared stable resources, not any specific outcome of any specific resource being exhausted.

oh_sigh|2 years ago

Sure - my point was that maybe mammoths weren't viewed as nice shared stable resources, but rather like cruel giants that might destroy your settlement, crops, and family randomly for fun. Sort of like how how elephants are viewed by rural farmer folk in many parts of Africa.