(no title)
erklik | 2 years ago
You can't exercise off calories. The difference in burning rate vs consumption is far too high for most cases.. I always thought the exercise that helped age better, was largely that the diet remains constant..
erklik | 2 years ago
You can't exercise off calories. The difference in burning rate vs consumption is far too high for most cases.. I always thought the exercise that helped age better, was largely that the diet remains constant..
arghnoname|2 years ago
My weight lifting doesn't burn many calories, but I typically burn 2000-3000 calories a week running. This is close enough to my basal metabolic rate that it is calorically equivalent to fasting one day per week. This is more exercise than is typical, granted, but it does suggest that one can exercise off calories and it doesn't take all that much time to make a dent.
I will say, this kind of caloric burn ups my appetite and I'm not trying to lose weight, so I eat more to compensate.
bartonfink|2 years ago
Some people hear "one mile burns roughly a soda", look at the numbers and assume that weight loss through exercise is not going to work for them or anyone. These people give up way too easy.
whirlwin|2 years ago
One would most certainly require more calories if he/her started training.
silisili|2 years ago
If you're an olympic athlete swimming 10 miles a day, you need more calories.
If you're the typical American walking or jogging even for an hour, you burn basically a can of Coke or two.
ekianjo|2 years ago
JumpCrisscross|2 years ago
Not necessarily. Consider the calories you're burning carrying around fat or being inflamed or from a higher resting heart rate.