top | item 38840641 (no title) maushu | 2 years ago Funny that it's so noticeable because of the hostile architecture. discuss order hn newest IshKebab|2 years ago What hostile architecture? This is on the underground. Nobody is going to be sleeping on these seats. throwawayffffas|2 years ago The hostile architecture in this instance is the choice to use benches instead of seats with back support. load replies (2) petesergeant|2 years ago What is hostile about the architecture here? The armrests? jeroenhd|2 years ago If the (quite useless) armrests weren't there to prevent the homeless from sleeping on them, people wouldn't be sitting in the exact same spot every time, causing a light smear instead of defined person-like shaped on the wall. load replies (8)
IshKebab|2 years ago What hostile architecture? This is on the underground. Nobody is going to be sleeping on these seats. throwawayffffas|2 years ago The hostile architecture in this instance is the choice to use benches instead of seats with back support. load replies (2)
throwawayffffas|2 years ago The hostile architecture in this instance is the choice to use benches instead of seats with back support. load replies (2)
petesergeant|2 years ago What is hostile about the architecture here? The armrests? jeroenhd|2 years ago If the (quite useless) armrests weren't there to prevent the homeless from sleeping on them, people wouldn't be sitting in the exact same spot every time, causing a light smear instead of defined person-like shaped on the wall. load replies (8)
jeroenhd|2 years ago If the (quite useless) armrests weren't there to prevent the homeless from sleeping on them, people wouldn't be sitting in the exact same spot every time, causing a light smear instead of defined person-like shaped on the wall. load replies (8)
IshKebab|2 years ago
throwawayffffas|2 years ago
petesergeant|2 years ago
jeroenhd|2 years ago