top | item 38848646

(no title)

demizer | 2 years ago

Crazy to think if plan9 had been MIT licensed from the start it would probably be running the world right now.

discuss

order

api|2 years ago

My favorite explanation for the well known “worse is better” observation about systems software is that it’s a downstream of the fact that worse is free.

There have been vastly superior systems to Unix but with commercial licenses.

Thrymr|2 years ago

Unix itself was a commercial system, licensed by AT&T to various other companies, that nearly fragmented itself to death before being resurrected by the free/open variants (*BSD, GNU, and Linux). See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_wars

msla|2 years ago

While we're playing this, I wonder what might have become of Inferno had it been Open Sourced back when it was still potentially relevant:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inferno_(operating_system)

TL;DR: The Unix people make a Java.

sillywalk|2 years ago

Interesting question. I'm always curious at these other operating systems.

I was a teen at the time, but in hindsight, in '96-97 'open source' from commercial vendors wasn't the norm, and Lucent finding income from openInferno would've been big change in business model.

Java was meant to be familiar to C/C++ programmers, of which there were a lot. I'm not sure how Limbo would compare in terms of learning / productivity. And would there have been a Windows native "Inferno/Limbo" IDE type thing. (If there was one, please let me know)

Inferno would've needed a killer app. I assume it'd perform better than Java, and at the time it would've competed with small Java applets. Java desktop didn't happen, I recall Corel trying and failing to port Word Perfect to Java. I don't know how if anybody ever tried to write an office suite in Limbo.

AlecSchueler|2 years ago

Wow, this one somehow passed me by, thanks for sharing!