In this repo: furry. A coworker of mine reported another repository of this author (or another contributor?) for according to my coworker containing CP. Read issue 474 as well.
afaik it wasn't CP per se, it was images of botched circumcisions because he is very anticircumcision and had that as evidence for why. Still not appropriate to be anywhere near a git repo but the context is vastly different than cp. This doesn't change the recommendation to not touch this project with a 100 foot pole, but I think context is important.
Hardly reprehensible. Not a very "professional thing sure, I wouldn't trust a browser made by someone who puts porn in the source but its not like its a moral failing for what seems to be someone's side project
Edit: I see the accusations of containing cp, that's way more concerning and obvious why you didn't link it but you could have just said that.
carreau|2 years ago
snapplebobapple|2 years ago
babypuncher|2 years ago
CP would be another story entirely but I need evidence of that before I act on it.
Snuupy|2 years ago
hhh|2 years ago
vorticalbox|2 years ago
Snow_Falls|2 years ago
Edit: I see the accusations of containing cp, that's way more concerning and obvious why you didn't link it but you could have just said that.