[carreau]

In this repo: furry. A coworker of mine reported another repository of this author (or another contributor?) for according to my coworker containing CP. Read issue 474 as well.

[snapplebobapple]

afaik it wasn't CP per se, it was images of botched circumcisions because he is very anticircumcision and had that as evidence for why. Still not appropriate to be anywhere near a git repo but the context is vastly different than cp. This doesn't change the recommendation to not touch this project with a 100 foot pole, but I think context is important.

[babypuncher]

People throwing a fit over some furry art hidden in the source code is dumb.

CP would be another story entirely but I need evidence of that before I act on it.

[Snuupy]

That's disappointing. I don't understand why the author had to include this, it's so unnecessary.

[hhh]

seems dumb to include, but it's their choice