[junipertea]

Is the discussion about the paper, or about how it was unilaterally rejected?

[K0balt]

Meh, let’s see an open license implementation.

Unfortunately, I don’t find the acceptance or rejection of a paper in this field has much predictive value these days. By and large, the reviewers tend to be more and more like Wikipedia editors as time goes on.

[bee_rider]

Whether or not the review process works, open review is a slightly different process. I’d expect a skeptic of the review process to celebrate the idea of reviewers “showing their work.”