(no title)
markburns | 2 years ago
A future global system could have settlement on the blockchain. Like the current system does at far less regular intervals than the processing power of non-settled transactions.
markburns | 2 years ago
A future global system could have settlement on the blockchain. Like the current system does at far less regular intervals than the processing power of non-settled transactions.
TimJRobinson|2 years ago
There unfortunately is, to open a channel you have to make a Bitcoin transaction, and you can't use lightning without opening a channel. Bitcoin processes a max of ~220M transactions per year so to onboard the world onto lightning with only one channel each would take a few decades.
A real layer 2 could solve it, or having some trustless way to use BTC on other chains
markburns|2 years ago
But http seems simpler than what I've read about lightning more recently.
Total wild speculation follows:
As for the channels problem, it feels to me like you have something like ISPs or AOL being the thing that's needed to kickstart it. And perhaps the ISPs or AOL in this world are the employers and lightning banks. So yes you need bitcoin to open it, but with an employer you have the potential to have an entity with bitcoin resources and with a reason to send bitcoin to an individual.
Perhaps HD wallets with lightning kickstarter funds apportioned to new employees. This feels similar to the needing a bank account or national insurance number in the UK (social security number? in the US) to start getting paid, or similar to needing an internet connection. Yes you could choose to get paid in bitcoin and have the fees come out of your wage, and this would be similar to getting paid in physical cash today. Or you could get over the slight roadbump to get you onto the lightning network.
What would a real layer 2 look like in your opinion?