[lolsal]

Sincerely asking - how does this solve the problem? I could generate a bunch of dog-shit and then sign it and publish it. Even with user attestation services provided by Apple, Google, et. al - couldn't I even automate generating a bunch of AI junk and signing it?

[jprete]

This would have to work by individuals or organizations building a good reputation over time, so their specific output is trusted. The fact that an LLM outputted the text is not nearly as relevant as whether anyone has staked their reputation on its correctness.

[ShamelessC]

> This would have to work by individuals or organizations building a good reputation over time, so their specific output is trusted.

So…the current system?

[throwaway29812]

Exactly. This presupposes that humans are always better than AI, or that they don't produce spam or harmful content.

They do.