top | item 39024489

(no title)

TotoHorner | 2 years ago

> I don't know how to tell this without being condescending, but do you guys even understand how farming works?

Not sure why you're being condescending when you're totally uninformed & wrong lol.

> The fertile soil is a result of a long process of bringing organic material and ash and depositing it on the field. Exactly the opposite of what we are doing today

2 minutes of research would tell you that the Terra Preta soil consists of - tiny, broken pottery shards - weathered charcoal - bones/compost/manure

> It is very easy to see how this developed. They probably have noticed that if they keep throwing their leftovers or feces in a particular area, everything starts growing better there. The same if you throw out ash. Which they had lots of beacuse they were burning a lot of wood every day, living in the rainforest and not facing energy price hikes. If you have a village and you hunt and gather every day, if you constantly keep burning wood fire and spread it all around your village for thousands of years -- guess what -- whether you planned it or not you will create those fields because I bet nobody would be trucking the garbage far from the village.

The fact that you keep referring to them as hunter-gatherers when they've clearly developed an advanced fertilizer is hilariously absurd.

They were clearly advanced at farming.

discuss

order

onetimeuse92304|2 years ago

I think it would be better if you just red my comment more carefully.

Nowhere I called them "hunter-gatherers". That's something YOU wrote. You took words "hunter" and "gathered" and created in your mind "hunter-gatherer" which is completely different because it has a specific meaning.

People are still hunting and still gathering to this day. This does not make them hunter-gatherers. Hunter-gatherers describe a civilisation that is primarily concerned with hunting because they do not farm anything. These people were clearly farming, but farming does not exclude hunting or gathering.

The pottery, bones, compost and manure do not indicate advanced knowledge of farming. This just describes a dumping ground of a pre-industrial civilisation. That's pretty much all of the garbage they had. And they had to throw it somewhere and that somewhere was around them where the fields were.

I am not saying they didn't have any knowledge, but saying they had advanced knowledge is just jumping to conclusions.

yetihehe|2 years ago

I agree with everything you said in both your posts, but you should maybe try to be less condescending.

yellowapple|2 years ago

> Nowhere I called them "hunter-gatherers".

Earlier:

> If you have a village and you hunt and gather every day