(no title)
hudell
|
2 years ago
Those pills have different effects on people with adhd and people without it. A pretty bad explanation trying to keep it simple: The adhd brain basically destroys neurotransmitters in the brain before they can be absorbed by the body. The stimulant will cause a lot more neurotransmitters to be created so that more of them can be absorbed by the body (both the natural NTs and the ones caused by the stimulant). For someone without adhd there wasn't anything stopping the natural NTs before so all the stimulant will do is flood the body with one kind of stuff.
flir|2 years ago
Amphetamines make everybody better. And if you take too much, they make everybody worse. Look at WWII soldiers, 1950s housewives or 21st century undergrads for examples.
fasthands9|2 years ago
I presume Adderall was approved based on tests that lasted a couple years at most. It definitely seems like there is a class of medicine that can be beneficial in the short-term but be likely to produce bad results over decades.
I assume opioids could fall into this category too. In the short-term they could make people happier and more productive, but also their is chance of developing a dependency that may not be noticeable in the data until much later.
If drug X was found to benefit 100% of people for the first 2 years of taking it, but 5% of people developed a dependency that landed them in rehab or worse after 5 years, would we want the FDA to approve it?
I have a lot of libertarian leanings so I am mostly fine with it, but it does seem like the boundaries for what we consider beneficial or not are pretty arbitrary.
riwsky|2 years ago
hudell|2 years ago