top | item 39082865 (no title) kalessin | 2 years ago FLA3 is a first of a kind and is a bad example. Nuclear is working very well for France at the moment, we are back to high-availability and making a lot of money through exports. discuss order hn newest ViewTrick1002|2 years ago It is always someone else's fault when nuclear projects does not match expectations.I don't see much difference with Hinkley Point C started 10 years after Flamanville 3. Timelines and costs are about equal.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinkley_Point_C_nuclear_power_... the_third_wave|2 years ago > It is always someone else's fault when nuclear projects does not match expectations....as opposed to wind, solar, biofuel, tidal and other similar technologies failing at large scale projects? load replies (1)
ViewTrick1002|2 years ago It is always someone else's fault when nuclear projects does not match expectations.I don't see much difference with Hinkley Point C started 10 years after Flamanville 3. Timelines and costs are about equal.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinkley_Point_C_nuclear_power_... the_third_wave|2 years ago > It is always someone else's fault when nuclear projects does not match expectations....as opposed to wind, solar, biofuel, tidal and other similar technologies failing at large scale projects? load replies (1)
the_third_wave|2 years ago > It is always someone else's fault when nuclear projects does not match expectations....as opposed to wind, solar, biofuel, tidal and other similar technologies failing at large scale projects? load replies (1)
ViewTrick1002|2 years ago
I don't see much difference with Hinkley Point C started 10 years after Flamanville 3. Timelines and costs are about equal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinkley_Point_C_nuclear_power_...
the_third_wave|2 years ago
...as opposed to wind, solar, biofuel, tidal and other similar technologies failing at large scale projects?