top | item 39082951 (no title) jakearmitage | 2 years ago Why no std::string? discuss order hn newest flohofwoe|2 years ago Because std::string is pretty much the worst way how one would implement a string type. Sometimes it's better to not have a feature than to have a broken feature. jakearmitage|2 years ago Could you point me to implementations that you believe are good? Much appreciated. layer8|2 years ago Memory allocation, interoperability with existing libraries. Would require a huge new API and tricky design choices.
flohofwoe|2 years ago Because std::string is pretty much the worst way how one would implement a string type. Sometimes it's better to not have a feature than to have a broken feature. jakearmitage|2 years ago Could you point me to implementations that you believe are good? Much appreciated.
jakearmitage|2 years ago Could you point me to implementations that you believe are good? Much appreciated.
layer8|2 years ago Memory allocation, interoperability with existing libraries. Would require a huge new API and tricky design choices.
flohofwoe|2 years ago
jakearmitage|2 years ago
layer8|2 years ago