(no title)
alted | 2 years ago
In other fields, a hobbyist can do wood/metalworking or learn programming or build a robot kit. There's an onramp for people to start learning the skills, which makes a huge ecosystem of gradually improving talent.
But in microfabrication, even though it's the only way to make chips, screens, cameras, inkjets, and LEDs, the minimum equipment cost is millions of dollars. Even worse, it takes even professionals months to fine-tune a manufacturing process to make a new thing.
As a result, R&D is much lower than it could be, and most fabrication is limited to circumstances with a high chance of mass production payoff.
chx|2 years ago
You can learn a lot by programming FPGAs.
In theory, while I think you could build an SSI manufacturing device at home if you really wanted to -- just how many people build an internal combustion engine themselves to learn about it?
hobs|2 years ago
defrost|2 years ago
At least 30 kids in Transport class when I went to high school, more if you count the kids in years before and after.
Not a full build, mind you - only some parts were cast, but we did do full strip downs and rebuilds of six cylinder ICE's as well as having a cut-away display engine in the shop.
My son did better (IMHO), he got to build an entire light aircraft over three years as part of aviation in a public high school in Western Australia. He missed out on the ICE building though.
ChuckMcM|2 years ago
Consider a system that had 6mm diameter "blanks" and a tool that would let you put down an epitaxial layer, lay down, expose, and then etch a resist layer, etc. At those small scales, one could hope the chemistry would be manageable.
truculent|2 years ago
(But yes, to your point, most people are not)
mdekkers|2 years ago
Months for simple things. Depending on technologies and requirements, the fine-tuning (increase yield and throughput) can take years.
rpmisms|2 years ago
BlueTemplar|2 years ago
floxy|2 years ago