top | item 39130702

(no title)

safog | 2 years ago

FAO: People who're claiming GenAi will replace artist jobs.

It might happen but it's extremely difficult even using state of the art models like stable diffusion v6 to get consistent results. There's usually some part or the other of the picture that's broken and it takes a lot of work with prompting, blending, varying to get it to work.

Buy the subscription for 30$ or whatever and give it a shot. First you'll be amazed but then you start noticing the minor flaws and how much effort it takes to make it good enough.

It's still possible that some jobs will get replaced, not every NPC detail needs to be hand drawn perfectly, but let's see.

discuss

order

lordnacho|2 years ago

Mini-mills.

AI isn't going to jump in there and do you another Sistine Chapel or Godfather.

You have a restaurant, it needs some random Chinese/Italian/Mexican artwork. Are you going to buy a poster? No way, just generate it and hang it up.

You have a kid who needs to be entertained. Do I get a team of 200 to write me Frozen, world class singers to sing the songs, and animators? No. We'll start with our own 5-minute Peppa Pig style cartoon.

Your widget shop needs a website. Do you go to Getty and find a shot of happy couples or landscapes taken by a professional photographer? No, nobody cares if your happy family has 7 fingers on each hand. Generate the photo, plonk it on your website.

As AI swallows the cheap, low-risk stuff, it also gains scale to do higher forms of art. Someday your detective story with weird sweaters and cops with a fcked up home life will also become AI generated.

Eventually it will climb mount impossible.

quonn|2 years ago

Maybe it will, maybe it won't.

It took Amazon a decade to have a serious impact on the economy, even though it was working from day one. Now we have AI technology that's only half working. So what the impact will be and when is anyone's guess.

eek2121|2 years ago

Not unless they stop using copyrighted material it won't.

Remember, the legal cases are still ongoing.

mgcross|2 years ago

An artist (illustrator) friend sent me this link (NSFW) of another artist detailing his process of using img2img to stylize/enhance his illustrations: https://www.artstation.com/artwork/yDb1ax

Cheesecake content aside, I love seeing AI image generation used as an aid to an artist rather than replacing the artist.

teddyh|2 years ago

That lower left arm is much too long in the AI generated rendering. Granted, it’s also a bit too long in the drawing, but the rendering makes it even longer.

cj|2 years ago

My sister owns an etsy shop that sells customized items.

They have a graphic designer who's in photoshop all day doing the same repetitive task for each item that's ordered.

This is the first category of jobs to be killed off. It can't already be killed off because it requires some human judgement (at least right now) to make sure photographs on a custom ornament are centered and cropped in a visually appealing way.

I can see AI killing off that kind of low skill graphic design with very limited judgement calls (or creativity) needed.

quonn|2 years ago

Couldn't conventional software have done this? And it didn't. So why would AI do it now?

loregate|2 years ago

True, it's good as a one shot generator to then get a bunch of results and decide which to keep. Once you have to modify the generated result you usually also don't have layers or context to easily modify it anymore, so you end up wasting if not more time than if you would've done it yourself. This doesn't apply to everything though and it's good at prototyping and getting a general idea or feel for the thing that you're trying to make.

pimlottc|2 years ago

FAO?

jasonlotito|2 years ago

Apparently, something that can be replaced with the word "For". It's odd, because FAO takes a LOT more text to get it's point across compared to "For" even though technically they are both the same number of letters.

Consider also that "For" sounds natural, but in this case, FAO does not.

dmoy|2 years ago

For the Attention Of

nvr219|2 years ago

for attention of

gmerc|2 years ago

there’s a lot more to game development - environment textures, normal maps, foliage, gui textures, background sounds, concept art, etc and AI has been making a lot inroads to these areas

People over index on the hard cases but those are not the majority of work.

moondev|2 years ago

Curious if there are models trained to output 3d stl (or similar) files instead of 2d png

anonymousd3vil|2 years ago

I know it won't replace human artists right off the bat but it will help them accelerate their development. Just like coding assistant, artists can use this to visualize their ideas/drafts and then build upon to tune the work.

romanovcode|2 years ago

Tencent fired about 75% of their 3d bone animators last year. All because you could feed the bones to AI and type "it jumps", "it runs", "it crouches" etc.

cchance|2 years ago

WTF is Stable Diffusion v6? SDXL is latest and before that 2.1 lol

artninja1988|2 years ago

Probably reffering to midjourney version 6