[waqf]

My impression is that it's a technical case (not just about software, but really also about how accounting evidence should look) and that it was subverted by misleading testimony from the needed expert witnesses.

I don't disagree that the UK needs to take a long, hard look at its judicial system, but what system is safe from this kind of problem and how so?

[belter]

A system that does not put people in prison without guilty evidence? Because that was what happened here in all cases. Not faked evidence, worst, lack of evidence...

[mulmen]

Expert witnesses are witnesses to their expertise, not to the actions of a defendant. No conviction should ever be based on the testimony of an expert witness.