(no title)
hydroxideOH- | 2 years ago
I feel like this entire thread has a blind spot to the fact that this device is very much a luxury item. A 55-inch TV is ~$300. A high-end laptop is ~$1000. High-end noise-cancelling headphones are ~$250. You could buy all of those and still not reach half of the cost of this device.
The only people I can see buying the device are rich people looking for another toy, not as a serious competitor to other entertainment tech.
DetroitThrow|2 years ago
I'm surprised at how consistently people think that a technology that is so expensive and serving such a niche will end up having adoption asides from a few wealthy enthusiasts. iPhone 2 suggested retail price was $300 (~$425 in todays dollars) and provided "smart" replacement for your cell phone matching its features 1-to-1 while also providing more than what was available.
If someone imagines themselves buying this to watch movies "on the go" or at hotels or something, they're part of an extremely exclusive club.
ac29|2 years ago
This was back when most phones were still carrier subsidized and required long term service contracts. Per Apple's press release, the $299 pricing required "a new two year contract with AT&T". Unsubsidized price was about double.
https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2008/06/09Apple-Introduces-th...
ok123456|2 years ago
threeseed|2 years ago
Nobody is buying the Pro version of the headset just for watching movies other than the early adopters, YouTubers etc we have today.
The idea is that when a normal version launches for $999 it will be a far more compelling proposition.
pwthornton|2 years ago
Even if you have a lot of space in your apartment, it's hard to justify much of a home theater setup, as you will be really limited by sound issues.
jimbokun|2 years ago