top | item 39232793

(no title)

neon_electro | 2 years ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC

discuss

order

rayiner|2 years ago

Citizens United says that something that’s undeniably speech—a movie about a politician—can’t be suppressed merely because the speakers pay for it through the vehicle of a corporation. What do you think is incorrect about that?

If Citizens United has gone the other way, the Trump administration would have been able, for example, to order Facebook to suppress posts about COVID death tolls near the election.