top | item 39234246

Google Search officially retires cache link

52 points| maayank | 2 years ago |searchengineland.com

31 comments

order
[+] srgpqt|2 years ago|reply
I have found google to be aggravating enough these days that I've experimentally switched my default search engine to Yahoo. It feels a lot like the old (good) google, though only having 5 results per page is a bit disappointing. So far so good, will probably stick to it for a while.
[+] dreamcompiler|2 years ago|reply
I'm old enough to remember what AltaVista search and the rest were like before Google.

It feels exactly like that today.

Google didn't need to improve much over the years to stay in business; they only needed to keep ahead of the SEO spammers. They did that for a while. But now we have SundarGoogle which expended active energy getting worse and worse and worse.

Google is done.

[+] Hammershaft|2 years ago|reply
I’m loving KAGI search, wasn’t a fan of DDG.
[+] obituary_latte|2 years ago|reply
Agreed. Interesting that Yahoo was your choice. I may try it as well (have experimented with DDG and Bing a bit, but haven't used Yahoo since it was the only option back in the day).
[+] theodric|2 years ago|reply
I've gone completely off piste and started using Yandex. It's excellent! More Russian results, of course, but I can generally find what I'm after.
[+] calamari4065|2 years ago|reply
I'm always mildly surprised to remember that Yahoo still exists. I'd honestly forgotten that they even had a search engine in the first place.
[+] vitorgrs|2 years ago|reply
Why Yahoo, might I ask? It's just Bing engine with another name...
[+] andirk|2 years ago|reply
That was a super useful way of seeing a website if the website's server was down. Ouch.

So what does `<meta name="robots" content="noarchive">` do for Google search now?

[+] kgbcia|2 years ago|reply
The more Google loses market share, there is hope we will see competition rises. I'm liking OpenAI, Archive.org etc.
[+] obituary_latte|2 years ago|reply
Off topic (sorry), but has the quality of searches been on a steady decline over the last year or two? If I'm not just imagining things, wonder if it is because they changed the algo or if there is too much noise for the algo to work well anymore. Frustrating nonetheless...
[+] Workaccount2|2 years ago|reply
Yes, it's been discussed a lot in that time period how bad the decline has been.

I also use assistant a lot and it too has fallen off a cliff. Assistant in 2016 was better than it is today. Crazy.

[+] heyoni|2 years ago|reply
Google was at least super good at caching so if you knew the url you wanted a snapshot of it was almost definitely snapshotted accurately.
[+] staticfish|2 years ago|reply
Cached webpages have pretty much been dead since the pandemic, at least from my usage in the last few years. There used to be a prominent cache link under the search results, then it moved to a weird overflow menu thing, and then finally about a year or more ago, Google exposed no cache version for most websites. This just seems like confirmation.

Still really shitty. I used it constantly. I hate new Google.

[+] BlueTemplar|2 years ago|reply
Ah, yes, thanks for the confirmation, now I think that was one of the reasons why my use of Google Search went from infrequent to negligible in the last years - it wasn't just about DuckDuckGo adding a targeted time search feature longer than a year.
[+] ijhuygft776|2 years ago|reply
Just another step toward total un-usefulness ....
[+] netule|2 years ago|reply
I've given up on Google's ability to keep its products useful. For search, I switched to Kagi a few weeks back and haven't had to use Google for anything since.
[+] nly|2 years ago|reply
Completely agree. It's one of the most useful features unique to Google.