[alvarezbjm-hn]

Rather cathastrophic.

"Some experts caution that these tools can never substitute for the judgment clinicians hone through years of experience — but should instead augment it"...

Good luck with that. Tools can't have responsibility. (Bad for customers, good for organizations)

Elaborating: What % of autist people kills someone out of aggressive behavior? I am quite sure we don't know, because, I suspect, it is low. Compare that to the general population.

The only reason they want to put tracking devices on autists is because. unlike healthy people, autists can't fight back.

Once the technology is mature, you try to enforce it on (sell it to) exconvicts, immigrants and jaywalkers.

[mistermann]

> The only reason they want to put tracking devices on autists is because. unlike healthy people, autists can't fight back.

It could also be to keep attention away from where it should be: neurotypicals. A lot like politics, journalism, marketing, Transformer Models, etc: Attention is [Almost] All You Need.

And the beauty of it: it doesn't even have to be a conspiracy, it could be pure culture / emergence- perfect plausible deniability, especially if no one starts asking inconvenient questions.