[DarkUranium]

I've noticed anything copyleft-related will have edits in favour of not copyleft (e.g. MIT-style licensing) reverted, even if the pro-copyleft arguments are patently false in that case, or otherwise biased (e.g. mentioning specifically copyleft, but not alternatives).

This is typically done in under the guise of notability ("GPL/copyleft is notable, other alternatives aren't").