(no title)
rezistik | 2 years ago
To add to this, the article states it's the equivalent of 570,000 apartments worth of energy.
To what end? There is still no real use case for bitcoin, it can't compete with any modern financial transaction system in performance, it's difficult to secure, it's just a bad deal and I can't understand how we've allowed it to grow as much as it has.
fsckboy|2 years ago
>Crypto is so inherently wasteful it's completely unethical.
skateboarding is inherently wasteful, should we ban that too?
if people choose to do something voluntarily, and devote resources to it, I don't see a basis for you declaring it unethical. If climate change is your fear and we all decide to save ourselves by living in caves, some cavemen might still choose to engage in the cave-crypto-currency equivalent (carving big giant rolling stone coins?): it's not unethical, it's just not what you would choose.
LogicalRisk|2 years ago
The issue here is not that someone is doing something voluntarily and devoting resources to it, but rather that someone is taking an action that involves the consumption of a rivalrous good. The court's ruling notes this explicitly (from the article) "the very real prospect that devoting such a large proportion of the available electrical power supply to one industry would leave less energy for other uses which might result in increased costs to all other residential and industry customers in B.C.”
worik|2 years ago
* Skateboarding does not waste nearly as much energy
* Each joule expended Skateboarding is spent increasing fun, on crypto spent on greed
* More skate borders makes more fun, more miners is less fun
oliwarner|2 years ago
That's a bad analogy. The wastefulness of crypto affects us all.
EA-3167|2 years ago
rezistik|2 years ago