(no title)
fgsfds028374 | 2 years ago
The stuff literally boils out of the tank when your car is stationary. The refueling process is a weird process of suck and blow and it takes 5-10 minutes.
fgsfds028374 | 2 years ago
The stuff literally boils out of the tank when your car is stationary. The refueling process is a weird process of suck and blow and it takes 5-10 minutes.
amarant|2 years ago
There are some projects aiming to use it for steel production for example, and in a few areas where batteries aren't feasible, such as long distance flights.
But hydrogen never had a chance at competing with batteries where batteries are an option. In part due to energy inefficiencies in it's production(I'm assuming green hydrogen, since otherwise, What's the point)
pfdietz|2 years ago
bombcar|2 years ago
Liquid fuel is so energy dense that if you have to synthesize it and remove an equivalent amount of carbon from the atmosphere it’s probably still easier and cheaper than hydrogen.
autoexec|2 years ago
That at least seems a lot better than the 30 minute-several hours charge time for electric cars
theshrike79|2 years ago
Home charging is where it's at. You leave home practically every day with a full battery with about 20-30 seconds of effort every evening and morning.
Rebelgecko|2 years ago
I guess technically it can take much longer if you're using an L1 charger, but if you just plug into the wall at home you have the advantage of being able to charge overnight while you sleep, whereas for gas or hydrogen it's much more complicated to fill up on your own
cheradenine_uk|2 years ago
"During NASA's Space Shuttle program, which was carried out from 1977 to 2011, more than 24,500 tons of liquid hydrogen were purchased, of which 54.6% was used on-board; the rest was lost during storage, loading, or replenishment"
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20110008561/downloads/20...